Legal Opinion
Lipsztein v. Donovan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2001PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about October 6, 2000, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, found that the parties’ letter of intent was not a binding partnership agreement, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order, same court and Justice, entered June 26, 2001, which, inter alia, granted plaintiffs’ posttrial motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 (b) insofar as to deny defendants certain previously awarded setoffs for consultations conducted by plaintiffs at defendants’ facility but billed through plaintiffs’ Queens facility, unanimously modified, on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Andon v. 302-304 Mott Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc. v. New York YankeesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Jamaica Public Service Co. v. Compagnie Transcontinentale De ReassuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. ShoemakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Paull v. First UNUM Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Herbert v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Liddle, Robinson & Shoemaker v. ShoemakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Anonymous v. AnonymousAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017