Legal Opinion
Herbert v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*210Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry L. Crispino, J), entered February 21, 2003, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ motion to deem them in compliance with an order of a different Justice directing production of evidence, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court properly determined that defendants had complied with the prior Justice’s order to the best of their ability. There is nothing in the history of the case to suggest any willful or dilatory conduct on the part of defendants (see Cespedes v Mike & Jac Trucking Corp., 305 AD2d 222 [2003]). Furthermore, there is no basis upon…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Latture v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cespedes v. Mike & Jac Trucking Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Balaskonis v. HRH Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Melendez v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Lipsztein v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Diaz v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Westbroad Co. v. Pace Elevator Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Burch v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Myers v. SadlorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Jihuan Xiao v. Lifeng JiangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024