Legal Opinion

IOWA SUP. CT. BD. v. Winkel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 17, 1996No. 95-1723Published

1Opinion of the Court

542 N.W.2d 252 (1996)

IOWA SUPREME COURT BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT, Complainant,

v.

Gordon L. WINKEL, Respondent.

No. 95-1723.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

January 17, 1996.

Norman G. Bastemeyer and Charles L. Harrington, Des Moines, for complainant.

Gordon L. Winkel, Algona, pro se.

Considered by McGIVERIN, C.J., and CARTER, NEUMAN, SNELL, and TERNUS, JJ.

NEUMAN, Justice.

This attorney disciplinary matter is before us for review pursuant to Iowa Supreme Court rule 118.10. A division of the grievance commission has recommended that we suspend respondent's license for three months based on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  2. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. BlomkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HavercampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  4. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. PaulosSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. WinkelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API