Cates v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
A jury found appellant guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-502) and assault with intent to commit robbery (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-501). 1 On appeal he argues that the trial court erred (a) when it denied his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial, and (b) when it denied his motion to suppress the complaining witness’ show-up identification testimony. 2 We disagree and affirm the convictions.
Manifestly, the right to a speedy trial is a fundamental constitutional right. 3 The Supreme Court has warned, however, that it is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.