Legal Opinion

Cates v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 3, 1977No. 11122PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

A jury found appellant guilty of assault with a dangerous weapon (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-502) and assault with intent to commit robbery (D.C. Code 1973, § 22-501). 1 On appeal he argues that the trial court erred (a) when it denied his motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial, and (b) when it denied his motion to suppress the complaining witness’ show-up identification testimony. 2 We disagree and affirm the convictions.

Manifestly, the right to a speedy trial is a fundamental constitutional right. 3 The Supreme Court has warned, however, that it is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Gayden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Turner v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API