Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank Malfi
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 12, 1959No. 12623PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Following a jury trial, defendant-appellant Frank' Malfi and James San-tore were found guilty of violations of the narcotic 1 and conspiracy laws. 2
Malfi prosecutes this appeal from the District Court's judgment of conviction, entered following its denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial, on these grounds: there was insufficient evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict as to Counts 1 and 3 of the indictment, and fundamental error by reason of inadequate instructions to the jury with respect to the offenses charged in Counts 2 and 4. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. PeoniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Bernardino Chirez Hernandez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Kelley Davis A/K/A Tee, in No. 71-1778, and Inez Davis. Appeal of Inez Davis, in No. 71-1779Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Henry Rodella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. Ramon HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.