Legal Opinion

Pignolet v. Bushe

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1864PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of special term, appointing a receiver in an action in partition.

1Opinion of the Court

By the court, Undoubtedly, receivers will rarely be appointed in actions for the recovery of real property; for a court of equity generally refuses to interfere for or against the legal title; although, in actions to set aside fraudulent conveyances and in other equitable actions receivers will be appointed when the safe disposition and management of the property require it. Even in an action to set aside a purchase on the ground of inadequacy of price, where the defendants were in possession and devisees of the purchaser, the Lord Chancellor appointed a receiver, (Stillwell agt. Watkins, 1…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ball v. TompkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1890
  2. Goodale v. Fifteenth District CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Goldberg v. RichardsThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893
  4. Verplanck v. VerplanckNew York Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API