Legal Opinion
Wildearth Guardians v. Salazar
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 19, 2009No. Civil Action 08-1596 (CKK)PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, WildEarth Guardians, has brought suit against Defendant, Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior (the “Secretary”), 1 challenging the denial of two petitions submitted by Plaintiff, each of which sought increased federal protection for the Utah prairie dog. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs [24] Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record, which is opposed by Defendant. Although the parties indicate that they have successfully resolved most of Plaintiffs concerns regarding the administrative record without the need…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cabinet Mountains Wilderness/scotchman's Peak Grizzly Bears v. R. Max Peterson, U. S. Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Maritel, Inc. v. CollinsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Marcum v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- University of Colorado Health at Memorial Hospital v. BurwellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- District Hospital Partners, L.P. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Oceana, Inc. v. RossCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Banner Health v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.