Vines v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CARR, Presiding Judge.-
The accused was indicted and convicted of the offense of burglary. The property alleged to have been burglarized is described as “the shop, store or warehouse of Opelika Creamery, Inc., a corporation.”
The insistence is made that the indictment is defective. The word “good” appears instead of “goods.” This apparent typographical error does not make the indictment void.
The appellant entered a plea-of not guilty, without attempting to raise the question by appropriate demurrers.
We-do not hold that it was a demurrable defect, but even so the plea to the merits had the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Vernon v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
- Cook v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Rutland v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Evans v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Fuller v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Childs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966
- White v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
- Sullivan v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955
- Ivey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1969
- Vines v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953