Legal Opinion

Strickler v. SLOAN, ETC.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1957No. 18,806PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPfaff, J.

Appellant instituted this cause against the appellees, the complaint being in two paragraphs.

For proper consideration by this court it is necessary to explain the issues presented.

The theory of said first paragraph of complaint as stated by appellant is as follows: The first paragraph of complaint is predicated upon common law negligence and alleges an agency relationship between the appellees H. H. Sloan and Sons and the J. I. Case Company as well as allegations of negligence on the part of J. I. Case Company in manufacturing a latently defective inherently dangerous machine.

The theory of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Wright-Bachman, Inc. v. HODNETTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. Stevens v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  5. Elam v. BruengerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dudley Sports Co. v. SchmittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Stevens v. Durbin-Durco, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Blew v. ConnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Blunk v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. Bauer v. PLUMBERS'SUP. CORP. OF EVANSVILLEIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API