Legal Opinion
Chinsammy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 14, 2010No. 10-310CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff Sridat S.R.S. Chinsammy, appearing pro se, filed a brief complaint in this court to which were attached numerous documents and copies of correspondence. The complaint alleges patent infringement by the United States. Plaintiff asserts jurisdiction based on 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (2006) (“Patent and copyright cases”). Plaintiff asks for “judgment in the amount of US 200 Trillion Dollars for infringements of my Patent Pending Invention.... ”
Plaintiff submitted a provisional United States Patent Application, No. 60/855,975, on November 1, 2006 to the United…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 3rd Eye Surveillance, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Estech Systems, Inc. v. Regions Financial CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2020
- Geospatial Technology Associates, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Perry v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020