Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Don Siegel Construction Co. v. Atul Construction Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 1, 2000No. CIV.A. 99-0321 JEIPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is defendant Harleysville Insurance Company’s (“Har-leysville”) motion for partial summary judgment. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case because plaintiff is asserting claims under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270(a) et seq. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. The Court has supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs state law claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. For the reasons set forth below, this motion is denied.
I
Defendant Atul Construction Company (“Atul”) was hired by the United States of America to replace water lines at…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rova Farms Resort, Inc. v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Pickett v. Lloyd'sSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Masterclean, Inc. v. Star InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Cal's A/C & Elec v. Famous Const CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Metric Electric, Inc. v. EnviroServe, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- Boldt Co. v. Thomason ElectricalDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2007
- Highlands Insurance Company v. Hobbs Group, LlcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.