Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1989No. 87-1377PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. ("St. Paul") filed a complaint seeking a declaration regarding its duty to defend and indemnify Clarence Elliott in two lawsuits arising out of an automobile accident involving a taxicab owned and operated by Elliott. The trial court held that St. Paul did owe a duty to defend and indemnify Elliott, notwithstanding St. Paul's attempt to cancel the insurance policy issued to Elliott. St. Paul appealed.

Elliott purchased a commercial automobile liability insurance policy through Meriwether Insurance Agency ("Meriwether"). Meriwether placed the insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Gant v. WarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. City of Birmingham v. Stacy Williams Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Sparks v. Calhoun CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. JunglingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Miller, 1100619 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Ex Parte City of Fairhope & Bd. of AdjustmentsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte NorwoodCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  5. United Companies Lending v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API