Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1980No. 8021DC305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The clear issue before us in this case is whether the Rules of Appellate Procedure require service of notice of appeal either before filing or on the same day notice is filed. Plaintiff contends that so long as the notice of appeal is served within ten days of filing, it is timely served. We reject this argument.

Rules 3 and 26 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure control. Rule 3(a), applicable in this case, is as follows:(a) From Judgments and Orders Rendered in Session. Any party entitled by law to appeal from a judgment or order of a superior or district court rendered in a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Henlajon, Inc. v. Branch Highways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Spivey & Self, Inc. v. Highview Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Russell v. University of New Mexico HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API