Aubert v. Russell Collection Agency, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b)(6) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DE 23)
ANTHONY P. PATTI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I. OPINION
A. The Court’s Opinion, Order and Judgment
This case is brought pursuant to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”). The parties to this case — Plaintiff on her own behalf and Defendant via counsel — appeared for trial on August 19, 2016. Plaintiffs proofs consisted of her testimony and the admission of Exhibits (A)-(E).1
At the close of Plaintiffs proofs, Defendant made an oral motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(c) for judgment on partial…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hartford Underwriters Insurance v. Union Planters Bank, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Arlington Central School District Board of Education v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maplethorpe v. Citimortgage Inc. (In re Maplethorpe)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- WHITEFORD v. EQUIFAX INC.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021