Interdiction of F.T.E.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
NORRIS, Judge.
Respondent, F.T.E., appeals judgments of judicial commitment and interdiction.1 For the reasons expressed, we reverse the judicial commitment, modify the judgment of interdiction insofar as it ordered administration over the estate, and remand for further proceedings to ensure that F.T.E.’s *482current condition is consistent with a judgment of limited interdiction over his person.
FACTS
F.T.E., age 52, suffers from multiple sclerosis, a degenerative neurological disorder. Bedridden for approximately 10 years, he is completely incontinent and cannot bathe or turn in bed without…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hardin v. Munchies Food StoreLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- In re L.M.S.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Doll v. DollLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- In Re AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- State v. A.C.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Interdiction of Cornwell v. CornwellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Interdiction of F.T.E.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993