Legal Opinion

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 12, 1989No. WCB 86-16114; CA A50160PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Employer seeks review of a Board order affirming the referee’s order, which concluded that claimant’s injuries were incurred in the course of employment and therefore are compensable. We review for errors of law and substantial evidence and affirm. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988).

The referee found that claimant was injured when he slipped and fell in employer’s parking lot while leaving the premises after having been fired. Claimant was following his normal route from the premises to his bus stop. He fell when he attempted to sidestep a puddle on his path. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Compensation of Halfman v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. MalinenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Herman v. Sherwood Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Boyd v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Duck, Melissa v. Cox Oil Co.Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API