Legal Opinion

United States v. Joe Bertram, Jimmy Lester, and William A. Oesterritter

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 17, 1986No. 85-8694PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge:

In this appeal the three defendants, Joe Bertram, Jimmy Lester, and William Oest-erritter, were convicted for conspiring to manufacture, possess with the intent to distribute, and distribute methamphetamine. Bertram was also convicted on two substantive counts of distributing methamphetamine. Six codefendants did not go to trial. We affirm.

I. Facts

The facts are confusing and in dispute on several key points. According to the government’s scenario, Bertram was the mastermind of the conspiracy, Lester the chemist, and Oesterritter the chemical supplier. Bertram and…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. United States v. Nelson BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Jesse Wright, Jr., A.K.A. Jessie WrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. Edward J. ElkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Eugene JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Tommy Orr, Mark Auk, and Tony Auk, D/B/A M & T Auto Parts, George Lada D/B/A Petersburg Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API