Legal Opinion

De Lamar Mines of Montana, Inc. v. Mackay

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1939No. 8883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the district court denying cancellation and rescission of certain assignments of a mining lease and option, dismissing, appellant’s bill of complaint seeking such relief, and quieting title in the mining lease as against appellant in the appellee Centennial Gold Mining Company, hereafter referred to as Centennial.

The lease, dated June 14, 1933, covered certain mines and mining property in the State of Nevada, kriown as the Bull Run property. An option to purchase the property at a stated price was granted by the lessors to L. W.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Geddes v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Patterson v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Jones Min. Co. v. Cardiff Min. & Mill. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Smith v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Midwest Management Corp. v. StephensSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  2. Popper v. Havana Publications, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Koster v. WarrenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API