Legal Opinion

People v. Urban

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1924No. Docket No. 91PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

On exceptions before sentence, reversal of conviction of Joseph Urban under the prohibition law is sought, on the ground that the search warrant, under which search was made and intoxicating liquor seized, was void, and that the evidence so procured was therefore inadmissible. An affidavit was filed with a magistrate for warrant to search—

“a wooden house, barn and outbuildings located on the following described parcel of land, viz.: The east fifty acres of the south half of the northwest quarter of section 16 situated in the township of Mayfield, said county and State, and occupied by one…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McSherry v. HeimerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. People v. MuskMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. People v. FlemmingMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. People v. Lienartowicz.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
  2. Tongut v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Chruscicki v. HinrichsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. People v. RanesMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. WestraMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API