Legal Opinion

Weimer v. Board of Education

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1978PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Paul C. Baisley, J.

The petitioner brings this article 78 proceeding seeking, in effect, to annul the action of the respondent school district in abolishing the position of Assistant Superintendent of Business Affairs. Specifically, the petitioner demands judgment: (1) directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner in the position of Assistant Superintendent for Business Affairs; (2) or alternatively, directing the respondent to appoint petitioner to the position of Assistant Superintendent for Instructional Services and Curriculum; (3) or alternatively, to appoint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grossman v. RankinNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Young v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 6New York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Chauvel v. NyquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Amos v. Board of Education of Cheektowaga-Sloan Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Haberman v. CoddAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weimer v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. Weimer v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Weimer v. Board of Education of Smithtown Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API