Legal Opinion

Hull v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, Charles Pearson and others,-from so much of a- judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 30th day of July, 1898,. upon the report of a referee, as adjudges that the defendant, The Long Island Baptist Association, is entitled to receive the legacy of $10,000 bequeathed: by Joseph Wild to the orphanage founded or to be founded by The Long Island Baptist Association; also from, so much of said…

Read the full summary

Appeal by the defendants, Charles Pearson and others,-from so much of a- judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 30th day of July, 1898,. upon the report of a referee, as adjudges that the defendant, The Long Island Baptist Association, is entitled to receive the legacy of $10,000 bequeathed: by Joseph Wild to the orphanage founded or to be founded by The Long Island Baptist Association; also from, so much of said judgment as directs payment to The Long Island. Baptist Association.of said legacy, or any part thereof; and also ■■ from…

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:. This appeal involves the construction of the last will of Joseph Wild, who died September 3, 1896, leaving a large estate consisting, entirely of personal property. The testator, after directing the payment of his debts, bequeathed to his wife a life estate, in certain-*226personal property, and then gave the residue of his property to his executors, in trust, to pay a number of annuities with which- we are not concerned, and also a number of specific legacies to various charitable, benevolent and religious institutions. The clauses which have direct reference to the question…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Tilden v. . GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Patch v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Finlay v. King's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  4. Roe v. . VingutNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Lefevre v. . LefevreNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ward v. StanardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. In re Judicial Settlement of the Account of ManningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Ward v. StanardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  4. In re the Accounting in the Estate of HochhalterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1919
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of ScottNew York Surrogate's Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API