Legal Opinion
Latson v. Sessions
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 9, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2014-1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The pro se plaintiff, Elvenia A. Latson, brings these two civil actions 2 against Jeff Sessions, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice, alleging that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (the “Bureau”) discriminated against her on the bases of her race, gender, and color, retaliated against her due to her pursuit of earlier statutorily protected activity, and has engaged in a practice of promoting employees that has a disparate impact on African Americans…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hollenback v. BrandonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Menoken v. WeichertDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019