Legal Opinion

Lightcap v. Mettling

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1966No. 44,271PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. The action is against the driver of the car in which plaintiff was riding. Defendant has appealed from an adverse judgment.

There is no particular dispute as to just what happened.

Plaintiff resides in Offerle, and was engaged in farming. Defendant lived in Kinsley, and was a school teacher. For sometime they had worked as a “team” in officiating at high school basketball games in the area. For this work each was paid $15.00 per game. They also received travel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmid v. EslickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Elliott v. BehnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Bedenbender v. WallsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. Ehrsam v. BorgenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Sparks v. GetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rothwell v. TransmeierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  2. Carruth Ex Rel. Carruth v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Gorelick v. ErnsteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  4. Schauf v. SchaufCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Hibler v. NordykeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API