Pearce v. . Pearce
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
It would seem to be apparent tbat a wife may not assert a separation agreement providing for ber support as a defense to an action by tbe husband for divorce or have tbe agreement incorporated in tbe decree as a limitation upon tbe relief granted. G. S., 50-11. This we need not now decide, for tbe asserted agreement is void and unenforceable. G. S., 52-12-13; Smith v. Smith, ante, 189; Daughtry v. Daughtry, ante, 358, and cases cited.
A wife who seeks to assert a cause of action under G. S., 50-7 (4), must allege with particularity tbe language and conduct relied upon as constituting such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Martin v. Martin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
- McManus v. . McManusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Jackson v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Dowdy v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- White v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bolin v. BolinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Best v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.