Legal Opinion
Amato v. Latter & Blum, Inc.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 21, 1955No. 41850PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOISE, Justice.
This is an appeal by Joseph L. Amato from a judgment sustaining an ■ exception of no right or cause of action. ■ •' .
On a consideration of the petition, the Court must take as true, for the pur: poses of the exception, all well pleaded' allegations, but we are not bound ’ tq accept the plaintiff’s or the defendants’ conclusions of law. Herring v. Breedlove, 222 La. 1088, 64 So.2d 441; Succession of Gladney, 223 La. 949, 67 So.2d 547; Breaux v. Laird, 223 La. 446, 65 So.2d 907; Austin v. Succession of Austin, 225 La. 449, 73 So.2d 312.
Plaintiff brings this suit against Latter &…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. SigginsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Breaux v. LairdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Zichlin v. DillSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DeSoto v. EllisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Leggio v. Realty Mart, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ngan Tang Nguyen v. ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Kearney v. MaloneyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Latter & Blum, Inc. v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.