Legal Opinion
Medical Mutual of Ohio v. Denise Desoto Jose Desoto
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 30, 2000No. 99-3988, 00-3571PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*301KENNEDY, J., delivered the-opinion of the court, in which MERRITT, J., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 310-12), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
This Employee Retirement Insurance and Security Act (ERISA) action comes before the court on the consolidated appeals of defendants, Denise deSoto and Jose deSoto, from (1) the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Medical Mutual of Ohio (MMO) finding the deSotos liable for unpaid reimbursement funds due under MMO’s welfare benefit plan and (2) its judgment awarding MMO attorneys’ fees pursuant to 29…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Medical Mutual of Ohio v. Denise Desoto Jose DesotoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000