Janigon v. State

GIVAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant was tried by a jury with his co-defendant for the offense of Robbery. He was convicted and sentenced to a twenty (20) year term of imprisonment.

Appellant claims the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This Court will not weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses. We look solely to the evidence most favorable to the State and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom. If there is substantial evidence of probative value for each element of the offense, we will not disturb the jury’s verdict.…