CLINE v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtArterburn, J.
This criminal action was commenced by an affidavit charging the appellants, Cline, Covington and Henry, with robbery pursuant to Burns’ Ind. Stat. Anno. § 10-4101, which reads in. part as follows:
“Whoever takes from the person of another any article of value by violence or putting in fear, is guilty of robbery ...”
A trial by jury resulted in all three of the appellants being found guilty as charged.
The evidence most favorable to the state shows that on October 13, 1966, three men entered Van’s Drugstore which is located in Indianapolis. One man, identified as the appellant Henry, stationed…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Liston v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- McGill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Cotton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
- George v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by32 opinions
- Swope v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1975
- Burton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Pulliam v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
- Mosley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.