Legal Opinion
State v. Frey
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 26, 1984No. 84-371PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
Pursuant to leave, the State has appealed under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2315.01 (Cum. Supp. 1984), taking exception to the sustainment by the district court of the motion of defendant, Doris Frey, to quash the information charging her with abusing an incompetent or disabled person, on the ground that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-708 (Cum. Supp. 1984) is unconstitutionally vague. We sustain the exception and remand the cause for further proceedings.
The State’s operative information charges that on or about October 6, 1983, Frey, while in Lancaster County, Nebraska, committed…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. CoppleNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GrovesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. RuzickaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SchmailzlNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ConklinNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.