Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bergstrom

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 16, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

1. There is no merit to the contention that the affidavit forming part of the application for the search warrant failed to establish probable cause to believe that some of the stolen items would be found in the apartment and in the car identified in the affidavit. 2. In the absence (as here) of any assertion that the affidavit contained a false statement of a material fact, the defendant was not entitled to call the officer who had executed the affidavit as a witness at the pretrial hearing on the motion to suppress the items seized pursuant to the warrant. Commonwealth v. Fleurant, 2 Mass.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. HofferMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. FleurantMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API