Price v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiffs motion presently before the Court is to compel discovery in a case to recover disability benefits under section 502(a)(1)(B) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B). As the parties acknowledge, the general rule is that review of a denial of benefits by a district court is confined to the administrative record developed by the plan administrator, and therefore no discovery is necessary. Wilkins v. Baptist…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bloom v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- Gluc v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015
- Kasko v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Mulligan v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Clark v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.