Legal Opinion
Fiaseu v. United States
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 20, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00752Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PASE FIASEU and RODOLFO Case No.: 3:22-cv-00752-GPC-BLM MARTINEZ, 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, 12 DISMISS SECOND AMENDED v. COMPLAINT 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 [ECF No. 17] Defendant. 15 16 17 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Pase Fiaseu’s and Rodolfo 18 Martinez’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC” or “Complaint”), filed by Defendant 19 United States of America. ECF No. 17. Mr. Fiaseu and Mr. Martinez have filed their 20 response in opposition to the motion to dismiss, ECF No.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.