Legal Opinion
Caputo v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 23, 2000No. 3:96CV2113 (WWE)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
In this action, the plaintiffs claim that Pfizer Inc. fraudulently induced them to retire and thereby deprived them of benefits under a Voluntary Separation Offer (“VSO”) in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”).
Pursuant to Rule 56, defendant Pfizer moves for summary judgment, asserting that the plaintiffs’ claims are timed barred. Also pending is the plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion [Doc. # 37 ] will be granted, and the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grishelda Bryant v. John J. Maffucci, Dawn Thackeray, Yvonne Powell, Norwood Jackson and Dr. Edward AllanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- John C. Donahue v. Windsor Locks Board of Fire Commissioners, John R. Colli, Jr., Russell C. Gabrielson, and John R. Colli, IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Anthony R. Caputo David A. Cook Paul B. Pebbles Duncan B. Robertson v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- John Doe I v. Exxon Mobil CorpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Burke v. BodewesDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Anthony R. Caputo David A. Cook Paul B. Pebbles Duncan B. Robertson v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001