Legal Opinion
Rothman v. RE/MAX of New York, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 29, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William L. Underwood, Jr., J.
The matter sub judice is an action sounding in breach of contract, fraud and violation of the Franchise Sales Act (General Business Law §§ 683, 687, 691) arising from the disputed execution of a franchise agreement. The contract between the parties provided for disagreement to be resolved via arbitration. When the petitioners and respondent began arbitration proceedings, respondent attempted to terminate the franchise. Petitioners obtained a preliminary injunction to preserve the franchise during the pendency of the arbitration (see, mem…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCormick v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Department of Environmental Protection v. Department of Environmental ConservationNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re the Arbitration Between Siegel & LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pereira v. PereiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- In Re Arbitration Between J. P. Stevens & Co. & Rytex Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rothman v. RE/MAX of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000