Legal Opinion
Department of Environmental Protection v. Department of Environmental Conservation
New York Court of Appeals
Decided September 8, 1987PublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
The City of New York moved in this court to hold Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation and two of its officers in criminal and civil contempt for willful disobedience of a partial stay order issued by a Judge of this court in connection with a contemporaneously pending motion for leave to appeal. The motion is granted only to the extent of holding Central Hudson in criminal contempt.
Central Hudson owns and operates the Danskammer generating plant and, together with Consolidated Edison, owns and operates the Roseton generating facility. Both facilities are located in…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- McCormick v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Matter of Spector v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People, Ex Rel. v. . Court of Oyer and TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- State of NY v. Unique IdeasNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by132 opinions
- McCain v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Rubackin v. RubackinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Dalessio v. KresslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- El-Dehdan v. El-DehdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.