Legal Opinion

City of Williamsport v. United States

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 4, 1968No. Civ. No. 9996PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47OPINION OF THE COURT

NEALON, District Judge.

In this case, defendant railroad, pursuant to the provisions of Section 13a(1) 1 of the Interstate Commerce Act, filed a notice of discontinuance of its passenger trains Nos. 570 and 571 between Buffalo, New York, and Baltimore, Maryland. An investigation was ordered by the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) and numerous hearings were held. At the conclusion thereof, defendant was directed to continue operation of both trains between Baltimore and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, the Northern segment, for one year, but was permitted to discontinue…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Levinson v. Spector Motor ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. New Jersey v. New York, Susquehanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. State of New Jersey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  5. City of Williamsport v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. City of Chicago v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  3. City of Chicago v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  4. Illinois Commerce Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1970
  5. Anderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API