People v. Barry
California Supreme Court
(Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Fitzgerald, C.
The defendant was accused, by information, of an assault with intent to commit robbery, *42and two previous convictions of petit larceny. Upon arraignment he pleaded not guilty, and admitted the prior convictions. He was then tried and found guilty as charged, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for the period of six years.
The evidence upon which he was convicted is substantially as follows: —
On the night of March 2, 1890, between the hours of seven and eight o’clock, as the prosecuting witness, George Engert, was walking along Harrison Street, in the city of San…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. RepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. McPhailWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. KapelinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.