Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Tech Group, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 2, 1992No. C4-92-914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

Employee Marvin Johnson seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing a denial of equitable apportionment. At issue is whether a settlement agreement and award bars full recovery of compensation otherwise payable for a subsequent, discrete injury. Concluding that it does not, we reverse.

Marvin Johnson sustained a compensable low back injury in 1978 while employed by Country Kitchen. He reinjured his low back in 1982 when he was working for Conwed Corporation; in 1983, he underwent lumbar discectomy surgery. He experienced an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Marose v. Maislin TransportSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. DeNardo v. Divine Redeemer Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Kulp v. Sheraton Ritz HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Hansen v. Jer Her BuildersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Mara v. State of Minn./u. of M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Busch v. Advanced MaintenanceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API