United States v. Alvaro Alvaran-Velez
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Pillard, Circuit Judge:
The question on appeal is whether the Ex Post Facto Clause forbids applying a current U.S. Sentencing Commission policy statement, which offers sentence reductions only to those defendants whose original sentences are not already below newly reduced guideline ranges, to a defendant whose crime occurred before that version of the policy statement took effect. The defendant, Alvaro Alvaran-Velez, claims that he could have gotten a sentence reduction under the version of the policy statement in effect at the time of his crime. Using a newer version, he argues, violated the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Carlos CeglediCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022