Legal Opinion

United States v. Alvaro Alvaran-Velez

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 5, 2019No. 17-3065PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pillard, Circuit Judge:

The question on appeal is whether the Ex Post Facto Clause forbids applying a current U.S. Sentencing Commission policy statement, which offers sentence reductions only to those defendants whose original sentences are not already below newly reduced guideline ranges, to a defendant whose crime occurred before that version of the policy statement took effect. The defendant, Alvaro Alvaran-Velez, claims that he could have gotten a sentence reduction under the version of the policy statement in effect at the time of his crime. Using a newer version, he argues, violated the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  3. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Lynce v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlos CeglediCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API