Sluyter v. Hale Fireworks Partnership
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Paul Danielson, Justice.
Appellants Aaron and Cheryl Sluyter appeal from the circuit court’s judgment vacating and setting aside a reciprocal easement, which they had with appellees Hale Fireworks Partnership, Robert Mitchell Hale, Suzyn Hale, Jane Hale, and Lucas Hale (hereinafter jointly referred to as “HFP”). Their sole point on appeal is that the circuit court erred in vacating and setting aside a written easement that ran with the land. HFP cross-appeals, asserting that the circuit court erred in denying its request for attorney’s fees. We reverse and remand on direct appeal, which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. KostermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Wynn v. GarlandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1857
- Emery v. CrowleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Kennedy v. PappSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Cotsifas v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rudy Webb v. Exxon Mobil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Edge v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Osborn v. TennisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
- Glendon Bobo and Donnie Bobo v. Cody Ray Askew, Ashlee Michael Askew, and Dorsey Ray AskewCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
- Bradshaw v. Enterprise Realty, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.