Legal Opinion
Retailers' Fire Ins. Co. v. Jackson Gin Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 10, 1928No. 3084PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHall, C. J.
The appellee in this case has not favored us with a brief, and under Court of Civil Appeals rule No. 41, we will adopt the statement of the nature and result of the suit made by appellant, which is as follows:
By its original petition, the Jackson Gin Company alleged that on October 20, 1926, it was, and for some time had been, the owner of a certain gin situated in Groom, Tex.; that at all of such times, the defendant maintained an insurance agency in Shamrock, Tex., known as the Sherwood Agency, of which one Ben Wooten was a partner and was the duly authorized agent of the defendant to enter…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gibbs v. BarkleyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Schumann v. Brownwood Mut. Life Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Brown v. City Service Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Camden Fire Ins. v. HillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Taylor v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Traylor v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Taber v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Traylor v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977