Legal Opinion

Powell v. First State Bank of Clinton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 30, 1915No. 5656Published

Error jrom District Court, Custer County; James R. Tolbert, Judge. Action by the First State Bank of Clinton against L. L. Murray, wherein garnishment summons was issued against H. C. Powell and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and the garnishees bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBBERTS, C.

The First State Bank of Clinton, Okla., defendant in error, brought an action against one L. L. Murray, in the district court of Custer county, Okla., and had a garnishee summons issued against H. C. Powell and S. L. Shore, plaintiffs in error. Plaintiffs in error answered the garnishment proceedings by affidavit, saying that they had no property within their possession belonging to Murray, and that they were not in any manner indebted to him. Upon this, the defendant in error took issue, trial was had before the court, and *46judgment rendered against the plaintiffs in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wedd v. GatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. State National Bank v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Cowan v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API