Legal Opinion

Young v. Wall

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided March 5, 2005No. 03-220SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

SMITH, District Judge.

Citizens have a protected property interest in the wages that are earned from their labor and the interest that accumulates from those wages. However, prisoners maintain diminished property rights, and therefore diminished ownership rights in earnings from labor performed while confined. In this case, Plaintiff Edward Eugene Young (“Plaintiff’ or “Young”), a prisoner at the Adult Correctional Institutions (“ACI”), seeks to hold A.T. Wall (“Defendant” or “Wall”), as the director of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (“RIDOC”), liable for an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Young v. WallCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API