James Lee Frango v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSELL, Judge.
James Lee Frango, appellant, was convicted of grand larceny of timber in violation of Code § 55-334.1 and, for unrelated conduct, second offense misdemeanor petit larceny. On appeal, he argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the conviction for violation of Code § 55-334.1 because the Commonwealth failed to prove that the timber had any value, let alone that the timber was worth $200. He also contends the trial court erred in sentencing him to two years’ incarceration on the second offense petit larceny conviction. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ohree v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Bolden v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2008
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Harry M. Williams, Jr. v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
- James Donta Whitfield v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Jones v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Nathan Lee Shanklin v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.