Legal Opinion
Lebold v. Inland Steel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided July 19, 1943No. 8233, 8234PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Both plaintiffs and defendant attack a judgment fixing plaintiffs’ damages in pursuance of ,our mandate in 125 F.2d 369, the. District Court- having found the value of capital stock of the Inland Steamship Company as a “going prosperous concern, continuing in business” on May 1, 1936 to have been $2,350 per share. Plaintiffs assert that the evidence was such that the court could properly have fixed only a greater value. Defendant contends that the court could not rightly have attributed any value to the shares other than that of the physical assets; and, alternately,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Southern Pacific Co. v. BogertSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Golden v. CervenkaIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Arnold F. Habig and Jerome M. SchroeringCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- In Re Security Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Allied Electric Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1961
- Rouda v. CrockerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.