Legal Opinion
Greenwich House Holding Corp. v. New York City Water Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 2008Published
1Opinion of the Court
Respondents’ decision not to accept petitioner’s election of metered billing form as a request for meter installation was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of MHG Family Ltd. Partnership v New York City Water Bd., 46 AD3d 472 [2007]). Nor does estoppel apply (see Matter of Daleview Nursing Home v Axelrod, 62 NY2d 30, 33 [1984]; Matter of 333 E. 89 Realty v New York City Water Bd., 272 AD2d 549, 550 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 762 [2000]), particularly since respondent Department of Environmental Protection’s predeadline March 31, 2000 notice should have alerted petitioner that the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daleview Nursing Home v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- MHG Family Ltd. Partnership v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Pistilli Associates III, LLC v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- 333 E. 89 Realty L. L. C. v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Haav 575 Realty Corp. v. New York City Water BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007