Legal Opinion
Renicker v. Marsh
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided August 13, 1986No. C85-3117APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BELL, District Judge.
On October 18, 1985, the plaintiff Terry L. Renicker filed the above-entitled action against the United States Army. Renicker, a former serviceman, challenges the Army’s determination that the loss of his eye was not in the line of duty but instead a result of his own misconduct. In this action the plaintiff requests that this court review the administrative proceedings conducted by the Army and thereafter have a trial de novo with a jury. The jurisdiction alleged is 5 U.S.C. § 706.
Renicker is a former Army private who is presently 40% disabled due to the loss of one…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sebra v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sebra v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Poffenbarger v. KendallDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022