Legal Opinion

Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 14, 1974No. 72 C 419PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Judge; *

This is a post-trial motion brought by the defendants pursuant to the provisions of Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “Offer of Judgment.” Specifically, defendants move to compel plaintiff to pay the costs incurred by them in defending plaintiff's unsuccessful patent infringement suit.

Plaintiff, a manufacturer of garment hangers, commenced this action in March of 1972, alleging infringement of the patented design of its garment hanger intended to support and display plastic waisted garments. In August of that year, pursuant to Rule 68, defendants tendered an offer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Staffend v. Lake Central Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1969
  3. Nabors v. Texas Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
  4. Federal Deposit Ins. v. Fruit Growers Service Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1941

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mary Hopper v. Euclid Manor Nursing Home, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Donna Crossman v. Michael MarcoccioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  3. DeWitt Ross & Stevens, S.C. v. Galaxy Gaming & Racing Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
  5. Hermandad Unida de Carpinteros y Ebanistas de América v. V. & E. Engineering Construction Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API