Federal Deposit Ins. v. Fruit Growers Service Co.
District Court, E.D. Washington
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELLENBACH, District Judge.
Defendants moved to re-tax costs by eliminating therefrom certain witness fees and the cost of taking the deposition of R. D. McCornack. While the amounts involved are not large, the implications involved in the motion are such as would justify a statement of the facts,
This is an action on a promissory note. The answer admitted the execution of the note but put in issue the allegations of several paragraphs in the Complaint. The answer set forth affirmatively a claim of set-off in which a rather complicated business transaction between the parties was pleaded.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884
- Elfelt v. SteinhartDistrict Court, D. California · 1880
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marvin Jones, on His Own Behalf and on Behalf of Those Similarly Situated v. Fred R. Diamond, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Greenwood v. StevensonDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1980
- Curacao Trading Co. v. Federal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Davis v. SeversonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.