Legal Opinion

Hurwitz v. Bocian

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 26, 1996No. 94-P-1890PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.

Soon after commencing her employment with Prime Communications, Inc. (Prime), Heidi Hurwitz became romantically involved with Neal Bocian who ultimately became the sole shareholder in Prime. In 1987, Prime fell upon a two-year period of financial difficulty. Throughout that period, Bocian repeatedly assured Hurwitz, who had proved herself to be an excellent executive and salesperson, that if she were patient and saw the company through its difficulties, she would be an equal partner in the business. When their personal relationship came to an end in 1990, Hurwitz decided that her business…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Nei v. BurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Loranger Construction Corp. v. E. F. Hauserman Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. McNamara v. HoneymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Cellucci v. Sun Oil Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  2. Fraelick v. PerkettPR, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  3. Oil v. RiemerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Sorenson v. FeltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. M.J. Flaherty Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API